Extra username and password are essential for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, it is also a perfectly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
Like a society, it really is essential to continue striving for a just legal system that assures fairness, protection, and regard for all individuals’ right to life.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal suggestions or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed into the court in which the case has been or will be filed.
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive bit of legislation that defines a variety of criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for people found guilty.
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in how that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the wider legal principles.
Permit’s concentrate on what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
6. Mere involvement in the heinous offence is not any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for that concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, because then He's powering the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more demanded for further investigation, therefore, his steady incarceration would not provide any beneficial purpose at this stage.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, such as eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of your seized currency.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent along with the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case law by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This might take place several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of the High Court of Justice, later in the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his enhancement from the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.
Alternative Punishment: In some cases, the court could have the discretion to award life imprisonment as an alternative towards the death penalty. Life imprisonment involves the offender spending the remainder of their life at the rear of bars without the possibility of parole or early release.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is perfectly founded now that the provision for proforma promotion will not be alien or unfamiliar to your civil servant service framework however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority might if happy that a civil servant who was entitled to be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his individual, wrongfully prevented from rendering service on the Federation/ province inside the higher post, direct that this kind of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of spend and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
a hundred and fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could read more possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.
Comments on “Not known Facts About tort and contract law cases”